Man Killed and Cooked his mother body Parts,Bombay high court pronounced Death sentenced to accused.

ASJ ,kolhapur awarded death sentence to convict, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to hang by neck, till he is dead. A fine of Rs.25,000/- was also imposed and he was directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months. The convict has not preferred an appeal against his conviction and sentence of death.

This is a most brutal, barbaric and gruesome murder of a 60 years old mother by her son at Makadwala Vasahat, Kolhapur. Convict was accustomed to consume liquor. He used to harass his wife. The wife could not tolerate harassment at the hands of the convict and, therefore,she deserted him with three daughters and a son and came to . Deceased Yallava was a widow surviving on the pension of her husband to the tune of Rs.4,000/- per month.

Since the convict was residing alone, Yallava used to provide him two square meals. however, the convict used to beat her on account of pension amount, which it seems, he used to demand.

On day of 28.08.2017,Rakshata( Eight year old girl ), who was playing in front of the house of the convict, first noticed Yellava murdered in her house and her dead body lying in a pool of blood. She also noticed convict standing over there, whose hands, clothes as well as mouth were smeared with blood. Rakshata made a hue and cry and rushed to the house of the brother of the convict Raju. Rajurushed to the spot of incident only to witness the horrendous crime, wherein his mother was lying on the floor naked, in a pool of blood and her body parts i.e. liver, intestine, heart, rib and breast were eviscerated outside. He also noticed two knives and one Sattur (Chopper) stained with blood, lying on the spot. By that time, the police arrived at the scene of, who was later taken into the custody by the Police.

After the Trial in the court, Accused found guilty and court pronounced Regorious prisonment and death sentence as declare or categorizing the case as the one falling under the doctrine of “rarest of the rare case”.

Disclaimer: (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the KanoonKiBaat staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


Source Link

Leave a Reply